Archives - Creigh Deeds Pro-Choice Record
November 2001
Virginia 25th District Senate Race: Creigh Deeds Pro-Choice Record
Search for:

Home

"Creigh Deeds, Delegate from Bath County, is considering his chances to run to fill the 25th District Senate vacancy: "I have been out campaigning with some people - with Don McEachin and [others]… and I think we have to keep our focus on November 6. But I have been talking to people, and I will keep talking to people."

He's strongly on the record as being pro-choice. A knowledgeable observer reports that in the last two General Assembly sessions, "Creigh's voting record on choice is virtually perfect. He has opposed every bill restricting reproductive rights in the past two sessions in the House Courts of Justice Committee, including the 24 hour waiting period. He also voted against [the] parental consent amendment offered to the emergency contraception access bill on the floor of the House."

Deed's was recently interviewed on the subject. He is forthright. "I am pro-choice. I do believe we ought to be about reducing the need for abortion - for reducing unwanted pregnancies. But I think we have to keep abortion legal and keep it safe."

He says that some years ago he "had been a Commonwealth's Attorney, and I was pro-choice. The first time I ran for the House [of Delegates], the week before the election they came out with a full-page newspaper ad calling me a 'baby killer' and showing pictures of fetuses, things like that. I thought I would lose - I couldn't believe that people would vote for someone they could attack like that. But I won. … These people are vicious!" (Dave Sagarin, November 1, 2001).

While Creigh has had a virtually unblemished pro-choice voting record the past two years, that was not always the case.

Creigh voted for the so-called "Partial Birth Abortion" bill, HB 1154, in 1998 [patron Roger McClure] and he voted for the parental notification bill, HB 2899, in 1997 [patron Robert G. Marshall].

HB1154 read:

Prohibits partial birth abortions. The bill defines "partial birth abortion" as an abortion in which the person performing the abortion deliberately and intentionally delivers a living fetus or a substantial portion thereof into the vagina for the purpose of performing a procedure the person knows will kill the fetus, performs the procedure, kills the fetus and completes the delivery. The bill also provides for review, at the request of the physician, by a three-member physician committee to be known as the medical necessity advisory committee, of the doctor's actions, with the results to be available as evidence at his trial. The offense is punishable as a Class 1 misdemeanor. This bill is identical to SB 552.

The bill received 87-yea and 10-nay in the House, Democrats Creigh Deeds and Mitch Van Yahres voting yes.

Subsequently the bill was passed to the Senate, where the vote was 32-yea and 8-nay, Democrat Emily Couric voting no.

In June of 2000, the United States Supreme Court struck down Nebraska's statute against so-called "partial birth abortion". And in July of 2000, the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals lifted it's ban on the procedure.

HB2899 read:

Abortion; minors; notification. Creates procedure requiring 24 hours' (72 hours by mail) notice to a parent, grandparent, adult sibling, person standing in loco parentis or duly appointed guardian or custodian of an unemancipated minor or judicial order prior to performing an abortion upon the minor. Exceptions are provided for cases of suspected abuse and neglect and where medically necessary to avert death or serious risk of (i) substantial impairment of a major bodily function or (ii) substantial physical injury. Minor in this bill is not delineated and will, therefore, mean individuals under the age of 18.

The bill received 81-yea and 18-nay votes in the House, Democrats Creigh Deeds and Mitch Van Yahres voting yes.

Subsequently the bill was passed by indefinately by the Senate Committee on Education and Health by a vote of 9-yea and 6-nay, Democrat Emily Couric voting yea.

A yea vote was to bypass the bill indefinately.

In 1999, the United States Supreme Court allowed Virginia's parental notification law to remain standing.

Note: Sometimes votes are considered anti-choice by some when in fact one must consider them more carefully.

For example, it was recorded that Creigh voted for the Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers in 1999 on the House floor, but he did so only after the Watts amendment was adopted (he voted for the amendment, too) to broaden the bill to cover many other medical procedures.

At that point there were a number of pro-choice delegates who voted for the bill, since the amendment was intended to keep abortion from being singled out and to help kill the bill eventually, which is exactly what happened in the Senate Education and Health Committee.



Comments? Questions? Write me at george@loper.org.