Signs of the Times - Elizabeth Kutchai Comments on Free Speech and the Charlottesville Chalkboard
January 2002
Letters to the Editor: Elizabeth Kutchai Comments on Free Speech and the Charlottesville Chalkboard
Search for:


Home

George:

I am puzzled by this move to put up a huge chalkboard and to make available an Internet site so that people can post anonymous messages. This is not what free speech is about. With freedom comes responsibility. I can voice my opinions, but I must stand behind them.

I'm trying to think of the kinds of things I could say anonymously that I wouldn't want to say for attribution. Mean, hateful things? Slanderous things? Obscene things? Untrue things?

Why on earth do we want to encourage this??? The only advantage I can see for anonymity is that I could say politically incorrect things: Red meat is good! Grade inflation is destroying academe! Our country is being overrun by Mexicans and Chinese! But shouldn't I have to stand behind these opinions as well?

Is there any way to stop the sixty-foot wall? It serves no useful purpose. We already have plenty of opportunities to express our opinions in this community.

Elizabeth Kutchai (electronic mail, January 20, 2001).


Comments? Questions? Write me at george@loper.org.